Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
Insolence | Being my first post here, and being lazy I'll just introduce myself by saying: Hello World! (hoping 1 person finds that funny) Anywho, I think I'll need a packet sniffer to 'listen' to messages I recieve in channel on Diablo II (trying the LEAST detectable methods). Tried searching and only found Ethereal repeatedly. I need something smaller, like a SIMPLE DLL to work with. I already played around with Ethereal and PlasticSniffer, both returned bits and pieces of the message, but I don't understand how to 'decode' the packets from them? I'm hoping I won't be a bother to you, I've used so many programs originating from VL (Chewbacca Bot is my all time FAVORITE bot) all I can say is thank you. | December 23, 2004, 4:32 AM |
HdxBmx27 | December 23, 2004, 5:08 AM | |
iago | Ethereal uses "PCap" (Packet Capture -- the Windows version is called WinPCap). It's a packet-capturing utility/library that you can use. | December 23, 2004, 3:38 PM |
hismajesty | WPE PRO | December 23, 2004, 3:40 PM |
HdxBmx27 | [quote author=hismajesty[yL] link=topic=9991.msg93311#msg93311 date=1103816439] WPE PRO [/quote] [me=HdxBmx27]points to my link....[/me] Its wpe pro, simple to use just like he wants, just click the program u wana log, and hit play. Not that had. ~-~(HDX)~-~ | December 23, 2004, 4:22 PM |
iago | the site for WPE would be www.fly.to/mtc | December 23, 2004, 5:26 PM |
hismajesty | [quote author=HdxBmx27 link=topic=9991.msg93314#msg93314 date=1103818953] [quote author=hismajesty[yL] link=topic=9991.msg93311#msg93311 date=1103816439] WPE PRO [/quote] [me=HdxBmx27]points to my link....[/me] Its wpe pro, simple to use just like he wants, just click the program u wana log, and hit play. Not that had. ~-~(HDX)~-~ [/quote] Use better naming. | December 23, 2004, 6:48 PM |
bethra | Isn't AutoIt what people use to make pindlebots? WPE Pro is easy to use. I stopped using errrr barely even used, Ethereal because I could seem to get rid of that dang header thingy that accompanied the packets I recieved Instead of recieving the regular BNCS packet header + packet I would recieve a bunch of bull crap then the BNCS packet header + packet. | December 24, 2004, 2:31 AM |
EpicOfTimeWasted | [quote author=Sorc.Polgara link=topic=9991.msg93368#msg93368 date=1103855506]Instead of recieving the regular BNCS packet header + packet I would recieve a bunch of bull crap then the BNCS packet header + packet.[/quote] I like how you refer to the TCP/IP header as "bull crap". I'd like to think it has its uses. | December 24, 2004, 2:53 AM |
bethra | [quote author=EpicOfTimeWasted link=topic=9991.msg93369#msg93369 date=1103856805] [quote author=Sorc.Polgara link=topic=9991.msg93368#msg93368 date=1103855506]Instead of recieving the regular BNCS packet header + packet I would recieve a bunch of bull crap then the BNCS packet header + packet.[/quote] I like how you refer to the TCP/IP header as "bull crap". I'd like to think it has its uses. [/quote] errr my fault, I mean "bull crap" as in, I don't need it for packet logging what I trying to packet log. how do i exclude it from the packet logging? | December 24, 2004, 3:16 AM |
kamakazie | [quote author=Sorc.Polgara link=topic=9991.msg93372#msg93372 date=1103858181] [quote author=EpicOfTimeWasted link=topic=9991.msg93369#msg93369 date=1103856805] [quote author=Sorc.Polgara link=topic=9991.msg93368#msg93368 date=1103855506]Instead of recieving the regular BNCS packet header + packet I would recieve a bunch of bull crap then the BNCS packet header + packet.[/quote] I like how you refer to the TCP/IP header as "bull crap". I'd like to think it has its uses. [/quote] errr my fault, I mean "bull crap" as in, I don't need it for packet logging what I trying to packet log. how do i exclude it from the packet logging? [/quote] There should be a function to follow tcp stream or something similar that will display the raw contents of the tcp stream in a nice format. | December 24, 2004, 3:26 AM |