Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
The-Rabid-Lord | I didnt write this but found it on my travels. http://www.rival.bnetweb.com/rival/content.php?article.24 That link is an article on how to hash a connection to battle.net. | November 18, 2004, 1:44 PM |
Zakath | It's not really much of an article. More a long example of not-incredibly-well-written code. | November 18, 2004, 1:59 PM |
Myndfyr | This might be pertinent in BNBDR, but I noticed that while it says "tutorial" it screams "be a cookie cutter code copycat." There is nothing there that actually *teaches* what is involved in hashing Battle.net. It is also not language-agnostic. Language agnosticism in a tutorial is not a requirement, but it is when all you do is give code. [edit]You just beat me Zak. | November 18, 2004, 2:00 PM |
Zakath | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=9596.msg89244#msg89244 date=1100786412] [edit]You just beat me Zak. [/quote] Arrrr, that I did! Oh man..."you must have setup.ini" Oh no! My method for storing configuration information (using the windows registry) won't work if I want to create a hashed client?! :o Shit, I don't remember importing either of those DLLs, either! | November 18, 2004, 2:04 PM |
The-Rabid-Lord | I only found it, as i said i didnt write. I thought it may be useful for others to look and see how its done. | November 18, 2004, 3:27 PM |
iago | I don't like using the registry to store information, personally. But that's personal preference, and an argument for another time/place :) | November 18, 2004, 4:22 PM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Meh link=topic=9596.msg89251#msg89251 date=1100791636] I only found it, as i said i didnt write. I thought it may be useful for others to look and see how its done. [/quote] I know that. I'm saying that it's not useful as a tutorial. It's copycat code. [quote author=iago link=topic=9596.msg89254#msg89254 date=1100794945] I don't like using the registry to store information, personally. But that's personal preference, and an argument for another time/place :) [/quote] Did we ask for your opinion on using the registry? :P Out of curiousity, why not? | November 18, 2004, 4:51 PM |
The-Rabid-Lord | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=9596.msg89259#msg89259 date=1100796669] [quote author=Meh link=topic=9596.msg89251#msg89251 date=1100791636] I only found it, as i said i didnt write. I thought it may be useful for others to look and see how its done. [/quote] I know that. I'm saying that it's not useful as a tutorial. It's copycat code. [quote author=iago link=topic=9596.msg89254#msg89254 date=1100794945] I don't like using the registry to store information, personally. But that's personal preference, and an argument for another time/place :) [/quote] Did we ask for your opinion on using the registry? :P Out of curiousity, why not? [/quote] My comment was aimed mainley at Zakath. I felt I was beeing flamed for something I did not desrve. | November 18, 2004, 4:56 PM |
Zakath | My comments were aimed more at that "tutorial," not at you Meh. | November 18, 2004, 5:56 PM |
iago | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=9596.msg89259#msg89259 date=1100796669] [quote author=iago link=topic=9596.msg89254#msg89254 date=1100794945] I don't like using the registry to store information, personally. But that's personal preference, and an argument for another time/place :) [/quote] Did we ask for your opinion on using the registry? :P Out of curiousity, why not? [/quote] 1. I format frequently, and it's much easier to back up programs that don't have a presence in the registry. 2. Programs are more easily ported to/used in Linux if they don't use the registry. 3. It's much easier to find/edit configurations by hand if they are files. Unless they put the files somewhere stupid. but eh. <edit> If you want to persue this, let's start a new thread somewhere. | November 18, 2004, 5:57 PM |
Zakath | [quote author=iago link=topic=9596.msg89264#msg89264 date=1100800674]1. I format frequently, and it's much easier to back up programs that don't have a presence in the registry.[/quote] See, I consider formatting a time consuming nuisance. I do it as infrequently as I can practically manage. [quote]2. Programs are more easily ported to/used in Linux if they don't use the registry.[/quote] This is a chat client that is completely based on the Windows API we're talking about here. There'd be no point in porting it to linux; it'd make far more sense to just write a new one from scratch. :P [quote]3. It's much easier to find/edit configurations by hand if they are files. Unless they put the files somewhere stupid. but eh.[/quote] Pfft...what are you doing editing these things by hand, anyway? That's what the config dialog is for. :) | November 18, 2004, 6:03 PM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Zakath link=topic=9596.msg89265#msg89265 date=1100801029] [quote author=iago link=topic=9596.msg89264#msg89264 date=1100800674]3. It's much easier to find/edit configurations by hand if they are files. Unless they put the files somewhere stupid. but eh.[/quote] Pfft...what are you doing editing these things by hand, anyway? That's what the config dialog is for. :) [/quote] <hypocritical-statement reference="signature">Pfft, Windows newbie.</hypocritical-statement> | November 18, 2004, 6:18 PM |