Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
crashtestdummy | http://secunia.com/advisories/12232/ | August 6, 2004, 6:48 AM |
peofeoknight | lets place bets on the patch time. I bet it gets patched within 2 days. | August 6, 2004, 6:50 AM |
iago | [quote author=peofeoknight link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=0#msg74302 date=1091775010] lets place bets on the patch time. I bet it gets patched within 2 days. [/quote] From the site: [quote]Solution: This has been fixed in the following versions: * Mozilla 1.7.2 * Firefox 0.9.3 * Thunderbird 0.7.3[/quote] So I bet it's already been fixed. I win! | August 6, 2004, 7:13 AM |
zorm | It took them 21 days to release a patch for this if you look at the bug report. | August 6, 2004, 10:16 AM |
St0rm.iD | what ever happened to the oh-so-untouchable Mozilla? | August 6, 2004, 3:55 PM |
j0k3r | [quote author=$t0rm link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=0#msg74329 date=1091807748] what ever happened to the oh-so-untouchable Mozilla? [/quote] That's Opera's title. | August 6, 2004, 4:16 PM |
crashtestdummy | They aren't untouchable. Windows is just the main target and as more people use it there will be more flaws found. | August 6, 2004, 7:35 PM |
iago | Opera had problems too: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1632120,00.asp | August 7, 2004, 4:11 PM |
Maddox | [quote author=iago link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=0#msg74479 date=1091895090] Opera had problems too: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1632120,00.asp [/quote] So did the ballet: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/544604.stm | August 7, 2004, 9:34 PM |
peofeoknight | I am not even safe when I browse on lynx :'( You would think that would be the safest browser. [quote] lynx' use of temporary files allows malicious local users to overwrite a lynx user's files or substitute contents of a downloaded file for another [/quote] | August 7, 2004, 10:48 PM |
iago | hmm, I'm actually using FireFox now, and I like it. Thanks to Lobo for giving me the motivation to try it :) | August 7, 2004, 10:57 PM |
St0rm.iD | why cant anyone write decent software these days!? | August 7, 2004, 11:07 PM |
peofeoknight | [quote author=$t0rm link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=0#msg74548 date=1091920033] why cant anyone write decent software these days!? [/quote] Why don't you write some and show them how its done! ;D Make me a decent web browser :-X | August 7, 2004, 11:14 PM |
crashtestdummy | http://lynx.browser.org/ | August 7, 2004, 11:15 PM |
peofeoknight | [quote author=muert0 link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=0#msg74555 date=1091920558] http://lynx.browser.org/ [/quote] Humm, I actually got my copy from http://browsers.evolt.org But I want storm to make me a browser.... ::$70rm w3b br0wz4:: | August 7, 2004, 11:23 PM |
St0rm.iD | I made a basic HTML parser that used a rich text box...does that count? That would be interesting, actually. Anyone up for it? | August 8, 2004, 12:12 AM |
peofeoknight | [quote author=$t0rm link=board=2;threadid=8042;start=15#msg74566 date=1091923942] I made a basic HTML parser that used a rich text box...does that count? That would be interesting, actually. Anyone up for it? [/quote] I made a web based parser one time to get around my schools network, but it got to complicated, we still would not be able to watch flash cartoons. I went back to using remote desktop and browsing through my home computer. I am not up for it :( I just picked up a site job that I need to do. You probably would not have to start from scratch. You could pick up something open source and mod the heck out of it... I would consider that to be acceptable 8) | August 8, 2004, 12:22 AM |
iago | I once stuck the Java object javax.swing.TextPane on a frame, set its type to "text/html" and put an address bar at the top. Does that count? | August 8, 2004, 12:25 AM |
peofeoknight | What I do not understand are hte images. You could parse through the html, and later the css. But how would you display images within this thing. I assume you would not be makeing a graphical browser. This seems like it would be some hard core codeing. | August 8, 2004, 12:37 AM |
St0rm.iD | I think a user-mode TCP stack that didn't use file descriptors would kick ass. | August 8, 2004, 5:47 PM |