| Author | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Mesiah`Grammas | i see youve gotten alot of nice packets and descriptions for them, but looking at all the events, i noticed you dont have 0x46, the battle.net message of the day. I know this isnt manditory, but hey, if u want it to be the best of the best, why not add it :-P IIRC, you just send a dword in the packet, and ittl return the motd. | January 31, 2003, 3:04 AM |
| Mesiah`Grammas | stupid thing, cant modify was going to say, what about ad banners also? i would post comments there, but theres no general section type thing for it... | January 31, 2003, 3:08 AM |
| tA-Kane | I'm also noticing that BnetDocs doesn't have *every* packet... Such as the gamelist (0x09) packets... And the 0x3A login that my Diablo 2 client uses... **Edit: Apparently, Arta could be hiding some Docs from us... =/ <MacBinaryBot> does the windows diablo 2 use 0x3A to login, or 0x29? <*Invert[vL]> MacBinaryBot: http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs/ <MacBinaryBot> does it have it now? i checked there earlier and it didnt have it <MacBinaryBot> nope; still doesnt have it <MacBinaryBot> and also still doesnt have the game list packet (0x09) <*Invert[vL]> if it does not have it there you should ask on the botdev forum <MacBinaryBot> k <*[vL]Kp> Those might be restricted docs <*Invert[vL]> MacBinaryBot: i think it has all that but you might need a higher lvl <*[vL]Kp> [e.g. not visible to base level user] <*Invert[vL]> yeah like Kp said <MacBinaryBot> hrmmm... <MacBinaryBot> why would certain documents be restricted? <*[vL]Kp> *shrug* <*[vL]Kp> Arta's decision on that | January 31, 2003, 3:50 AM |
| Arta | SID_GETADVLISTEX (0x09) is not displayed because my documentation of it is incomplete. I have taken care to make sure that BnetDocs is as accurate as possible, for obvious reasons, and things that I am unsure about will remain hidden until I'm happy that they're correct enough to be released. SID_NEWS_INFO (0x46) isn't displayed because it's not necessary for it to be. I want BnetDocs to be a useful resource, but I don't want it to eliminate the need for people to find some information out for themselves. I feel that people's possesion of such skills benefits the bot development community as a whole. BnetDocs is intended to be a middle way. My reasoning behind it is to provide people with enough technical information to write a bot, basic as it may be, without having to use 3rd party DLLs, BNLS, or ripped off source code - not to entirely remove the need for a little ingenuity. | January 31, 2003, 7:59 AM |
| iago | What? All I hear is "I'm going to make people actually WORK for what they want, unlike using BNLS!" ;-) | January 31, 2003, 5:41 PM |
| St0rm.iD | Arta: ditch bnetdocs and make it a wiki ;) | February 1, 2003, 12:23 AM |
| Arta | A whatie? | February 1, 2003, 3:40 AM |
| 0xdeadc0de | [quote] link=board=bot;num=1043996696;start=0#6 date=02/01/03 at 01:40:11]A whatie?[/quote] Wiki's are actually pretty cool... :) http://wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki | February 1, 2003, 12:21 PM |
| St0rm.iD | http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/ | February 1, 2003, 10:26 PM |
| Arta | Bah, that's what comments & reports are for :P | February 2, 2003, 8:40 AM |