Allright kids, lets see them. Pictures of you "ph" fat rides.

Oh man I'm pissed. Just got back from Ford dealer. The SVT and Saleen are NOT coming out in 2005. WTF? I was there to order my SVT (about $40k loaded) and possibly Saleen (about $60k loaded).

Now all they will have for 2005 Mustangs is the standard Coupe (V6 and V8), Convertible (V8), Mach 1 (V8), and GT (V8)-300 HP ($28K).

Am pissed.

But they did give me a large Ford GT400 poster for my trouble.

That sucks... but at least you got a neat poster. I should go raise hell and get one for myself.

Why not just buy a 2004 then? You're not getting that bad of a car. ;)

And btw, did I read it right that you said you were gonna get a Cobra AND possibly a Saleen?

I'm looking at buying an easily restorable 1971 Mustang GTX. I currently drive an '01 Audi A4 1.8T though :-\ but I wish I was driving an '04 Nissan 350Z

[quote author=Raven link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=0#msg45868 date=1077669534]
Why not just buy a 2004 then? You're not getting that bad of a car. ;)

And btw, did I read it right that you said you were gonna get a Cobra AND possibly a Saleen?
[/quote]

Just one. Have to fall in love with the Saleen to make me pay for the difference.

[quote author=Hazard link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=0#msg45870 date=1077669793]
I'm looking at buying an easily restorable 1974 Mustang GTX. I currently drive an '01 Audi A4 1.8T though :-\ but I wish I was driving an '04 Nissan 350Z
[/quote]

Heh, 1974? Could you possibly pick an uglier Mustang than that?

I saw a 1971 Mustang GTX on Torque TV that could do the quarter in 11.4. Suck it bitch.

I don't have any current pics of my actual vehicles, but here are the closest likenesses I could find of my truck & car:

[img]http://www.truckworld.com/Truck-Tests/98-prerunner/prerunner2.jpg[/img]
Mine is white

[img]http://www.classiccarshowcase.com/images/84jag2.jpg[/img]
Mine is silver

EEEEK!!! It just came to my attention I've been typing 1974 instead of my intended 1971. Sorry for the typo!!!!!!

[quote author=Hazard link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=0#msg45916 date=1077678540]
EEEEK!!! It just came to my attention I've been typing 1974 instead of my intended 1971. Sorry for the typo!!!!!!
[/quote]

Haha, now 1971 makes MUCH more sense. 1973-1982 were the lean years for muscle cars.

So, you suck it bitch!

What I'm truly after is a 1967 Firebird .326 HO Convertible >.<

What do you all think would be more fun to restore? A 1966 Corvette Stingray, a 1971 Mustang GT, or a 1967 Firebird .326 HO?

1951 Imperial, 1947 Plymouth, 1968 Camaro and a Model A.

[quote author=Mitosis link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=0#msg46605 date=1078018322]
1951 Imperial, 1947 Plymouth, 1968 Camaro and a Model A.
[/quote]

Why in the hell? A '67 HO would rape a 1968 Camaro.

I think he's talking about a matter of car preferance rather than "omfg my car could pwn your car".

My ride:

[img]http://www.digitaldoozie.net/newby/NewbysJunk/Images/Bike.jpg[/img]

[quote author=Hitmen link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=0#msg46634 date=1078024453]
I think he's talking about a matter of car preferance rather than "omfg my car could pwn your car".
[/quote]

I'm talking performance. Spead in quarters, torque, horsepower, and 0-60.

[img]http://home.wanadoo.nl/rudolf.van.laatum/plaatjes/scoupe.jpg[/img]

[img]http://yoni.valhallalegends.com/Netcooler/images/08-mycar.jpg[/img]

LOL!!!!!!

Now that is funny.

My beautiful Car.


[img]http://users.wpi.edu/~tymellon/car.jpg[/img]

Not really

[sarcasm] But I bet you wish you had that license plate [/sarcasm]

I like this better :]

[img]http://expectnothing.com/pub/posts/attached/DCP_0842.jpg[/img]

[quote author=Naem link=board=6;threadid=5437;start=15#msg46889 date=1078122336]
big picture
[/quote]

I've been on that road lol.