| Author | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| MailMan | I remember zorm made a binary gateway a while back, and then released the source code to it. Does anyone know where this might be located at? I'm just looking for the actually gateway, but I can compile it if all you can find is the source code. Thanks. | March 19, 2003, 5:34 PM |
| haZe | http://zorm.phactorx.com/Files/bgate.zip | March 19, 2003, 5:41 PM |
| MailMan | Thanks, it requires checkrevision.dll and hash.dll - happen to know where those two files are? They're pretty old, because most of the newer vb bots use an updated hash.dll. | March 19, 2003, 5:51 PM |
| haZe | March 19, 2003, 6:04 PM | |
| UserLoser => School | Why do people use hash.dll and checkrevision.dll??? I dont see why use two DLLs when Bnetauth.dll the same as those plus more, or BNLS ofcourse | March 20, 2003, 12:44 PM |
| Spht | [quote]Why do people use hash.dll and checkrevision.dll??? I dont see why use two DLLs when Bnetauth.dll the same as those plus more, or BNLS ofcourse[/quote] Why use DLLs when there's an amazing service called BNLS available! http://www.valhallalegends.com/yoni/BNLSProtocolSpec.txt | March 20, 2003, 2:29 PM |
| Zakath | Why use DLLs when you can build the functionality into the executable? :P | March 20, 2003, 2:43 PM |
| Grok | Oh please Zakath, you know the answer to that. You build routines into DLLs so you have reusable libraries of useful functions. You cannot even pretend that making a DLL of the mentioned functions is not an appropriate use of DLLs. | March 20, 2003, 3:22 PM |
| St0rm.iD | /me invented binary gateway ;) | March 20, 2003, 4:48 PM |
| Nova1313 | *nova1313 improved upon storm's creation and now has 16,000 registered users* | March 20, 2003, 7:05 PM |
| MesiaH | I remember when mesiah was a n00b, i think it was last week or so... Stay dedicated, stay open minded, stay passive, and stay on task. These will get you where you want to go in the programming field. | March 20, 2003, 7:25 PM |
| St0rm.iD | /me INVOKES COPYRIGHT ON NOVA1313!!! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ALL YOUR PROFITS ARE BELONG TO US! | March 20, 2003, 8:35 PM |
| MesiaH | copyright, what a funny word in this community. Like somebody is actually gonna copyright a client emulator which violates the original games TOS... | March 20, 2003, 11:34 PM |
| Zakath | [quote]Oh please Zakath, you know the answer to that. You build routines into DLLs so you have reusable libraries of useful functions. You cannot even pretend that making a DLL of the mentioned functions is not an appropriate use of DLLs.[/quote] Hehe...you're right Grok, that is a perfectly appropriate use. I just like kidding people who are totally dependent on them (that's a bad thing imo). | March 21, 2003, 7:23 PM |
| Camel | [quote]Why use DLLs when there's an amazing service called BNLS available![/quote] why use bnls when there's many amazing disassemblers available! | March 21, 2003, 9:18 PM |
| Spht | [quote] why use bnls when there's many amazing disassemblers available![/quote] Because you're comparing two unlike things. | March 21, 2003, 9:38 PM |
| Camel | ugh, this is soo not worth arguing over... | March 21, 2003, 10:49 PM |
| St0rm.iD | I hate it when Spht says stuff like that. | March 22, 2003, 2:02 PM |
| Eibro | [quote author=Camel link=board=17;threadid=503;start=0#msg3497 date=1048281487] [quote]Why use DLLs when there's an amazing service called BNLS available![/quote] why use bnls when there's many amazing disassemblers available! [/quote]Why? Most people don't have enough intimate knowledge of asm for a disassembler to be of any use. | March 22, 2003, 5:23 PM |
| Camel | [quote author=Eibro link=board=17;threadid=503;start=15#msg6242 date=1048353782] [quote author=Camel link=board=17;threadid=503;start=0#msg3497 date=1048281487] [quote]Why use DLLs when there's an amazing service called BNLS available![/quote] why use bnls when there's many amazing disassemblers available! [/quote]Why? Most people don't have enough intimate knowledge of asm for a disassembler to be of any use. [/quote] uh...i was being facetious? | March 22, 2003, 10:40 PM |
| Grok | uh...i was being facetious? [quote][/quote] It's been said before -- Nazi's are not welcome here. | March 23, 2003, 6:29 AM |
| St0rm.iD | [quote author=Grok link=board=17;threadid=503;start=15#msg6277 date=1048400972] uh...i was being facetious? [quote][/quote] It's been said before -- Nazi's are not welcome here. [/quote] It hasn't been said before, but learn to use [.quote]. | March 23, 2003, 11:04 PM |