| Author | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| R.a.B.B.i.T | It's not listed on BnetDocs :*( Does anybody have it at Ladder HC? | January 28, 2004, 1:25 AM |
| UserLoser. | [quote author=R.a.B.B.i.T link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41428 date=1075253152] It's not listed on BnetDocs :*( Does anybody have it at Ladder HC? [/quote] Explain what you mean any maybe we (Atleast, I) can understand you | January 28, 2004, 2:28 AM |
| R.a.B.B.i.T | HAH. I got it with some help from Andy (or rather, he just told me). I meant the byte that would allow my bot to recognize a ladder character from a non-ladder during stat-string parsing. (As it turns out, Byte 26 value 0x40 is a ladder character.) | January 28, 2004, 3:53 PM |
| K | [quote author=R.a.B.B.i.T link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41491 date=1075305212] HAH. I got it with some help from Andy (or rather, he just told me). I meant the byte that would allow my bot to recognize a ladder character from a non-ladder during stat-string parsing. (As it turns out, Byte 26 value 0x40 is a ladder character.) [/quote] I'm pretty sure it's not _value_ 0x40, it's the bit, i.e: (byte && 0x40) != 0 | January 28, 2004, 6:09 PM |
| Spht | [quote author=K link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41509 date=1075313347] [quote author=R.a.B.B.i.T link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41491 date=1075305212] HAH. I got it with some help from Andy (or rather, he just told me). I meant the byte that would allow my bot to recognize a ladder character from a non-ladder during stat-string parsing. (As it turns out, Byte 26 value 0x40 is a ladder character.) [/quote] I'm pretty sure it's not _value_ 0x40, it's the bit, i.e: (byte && 0x40) != 0 [/quote] Right, considering it's also used for detecting a hardcore character. | January 28, 2004, 6:34 PM |
| Kp | [quote author=K link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41509 date=1075313347]I'm pretty sure it's not _value_ 0x40, it's the bit, i.e: (byte && 0x40) != 0[/quote] Correction: byte & 0x40 /* single ampersand for bit test, double ampersand for truth evaluation */ | January 28, 2004, 9:28 PM |
| R.a.B.B.i.T | BAH! It works for me. It might have been 0x80, I didn't look at it for a while when I posted (I still haven't). | January 28, 2004, 11:46 PM |
| K | [quote author=Kp link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41535 date=1075325309] [quote author=K link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41509 date=1075313347]I'm pretty sure it's not _value_ 0x40, it's the bit, i.e: (byte && 0x40) != 0[/quote] Correction: byte & 0x40 /* single ampersand for bit test, double ampersand for truth evaluation */ [/quote] Righto -- what was I thinking? I actually went back and replaced the single amperstand with a double after I finished writing. | January 29, 2004, 3:02 AM |
| Stealth | [quote author=R.a.B.B.i.T link=board=17;threadid=4960;start=0#msg41561 date=1075333580] BAH! It works for me. It might have been 0x80, I didn't look at it for a while when I posted (I still haven't). [/quote] I told you it was a bitwise And comparison. :) | January 29, 2004, 3:37 AM |
| R.a.B.B.i.T | Shhh...I've forgotten about it completely by now and moved on to other problems... | January 31, 2004, 12:15 AM |