Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
taylorjonl | I am studying the battlenet protocols for Diablo II and started from the beginning. Basically used Ethereal packet sniffer to only capture packets related to uswest.battle.net. I started it up and captured the packets that came from choosing a realm to login to and hitting the battlnet button. I got these results. [code]SEND: 01 SEND: FF 50 RECV: FF 25 SEND: FF 25 RECV: FF 50 SEND: FF 51 RECV: FF 51 SEND: FF 33 RECV: FF 33[/code] The first set I am familiar with what they are from bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com but the 0x33 packet isn't listed on that page. Anyone know what they are for? | December 19, 2003, 11:53 PM |
UserLoser. | 0x33: SID_GETFILETIME Requests the filetime of a file that is downloadable from Battle.net. If the client's filetime of the file requested doesn't match the server's response, the client should download the file. | December 20, 2003, 12:52 AM |
taylorjonl | [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36412 date=1071881540] 0x33: SID_GETFILETIME Requests the filetime of a file that is downloadable from Battle.net. If the client's filetime of the file requested doesn't match the server's response, the client should download the file. [/quote] Thx. Did you research that or is it somewhere on this site? Don't like asking questions I the information is already out there. | December 20, 2003, 12:55 AM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=taylorjonl link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36413 date=1071881735] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36412 date=1071881540] 0x33: SID_GETFILETIME Requests the filetime of a file that is downloadable from Battle.net. If the client's filetime of the file requested doesn't match the server's response, the client should download the file. [/quote] Thx. Did you research that or is it somewhere on this site? Don't like asking questions I the information is already out there. [/quote] I researched this my self, although I'm sure it's somewhere on another website | December 20, 2003, 1:02 AM |
iago | It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs | December 20, 2003, 2:33 PM |
taylorjonl | [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I did know it had something to do with a .ini file since it is encoded in the packet but didn't know the specific purpose. Also you should note that in my original post I said that I checked bnetdocs but that packet isn't listed, which it isn't. | December 20, 2003, 3:49 PM |
iago | Ah, I didn't see that. And the file isn't really encoded, it's just there.. | December 20, 2003, 3:59 PM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand | December 20, 2003, 4:39 PM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=DarkMinion link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36474 date=1071941565] [quote] researched this my self[/quote] ::) [/quote] Uhhuh, don't roll your eyes at me - You should look around this forum, all the stuff I post and findings that most people don't even know about. I first posted the new changes in 0x54, a lot about 0x44, some findings from battle.snp, d2gs stuff, 0x59-0x5b i posted, and much more - I don't see you contributing anything here on this forum - And if it's not on BnetDocs (for my access level, if it's even there), where else would I get it from? | December 20, 2003, 8:32 PM |
iago | [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. | December 20, 2003, 11:01 PM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above | December 20, 2003, 11:02 PM |
iago | [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36529 date=1071961349] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above [/quote] Ah, well that was a simple mistake on my part. I didn't notice him say that, and I didn't go check bnetdocs to confirm, one way or the other. | December 21, 2003, 12:37 AM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36544 date=1071967058] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36529 date=1071961349] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above [/quote] Ah, well that was a simple mistake on my part. I didn't notice him say that, and I didn't go check bnetdocs to confirm, one way or the other. [/quote] Let's just say we had a misunderstanding between all of us :P | December 21, 2003, 12:51 AM |
iago | [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36548 date=1071967917] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36544 date=1071967058] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36529 date=1071961349] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above [/quote] Ah, well that was a simple mistake on my part. I didn't notice him say that, and I didn't go check bnetdocs to confirm, one way or the other. [/quote] Let's just say we had a misunderstanding between all of us :P [/quote] I think this discussion is over, but mass quotes is fun. | December 21, 2003, 1:57 AM |
Soul Taker | [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36557 date=1071971843] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36548 date=1071967917] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36544 date=1071967058] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36529 date=1071961349] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above [/quote] Ah, well that was a simple mistake on my part. I didn't notice him say that, and I didn't go check bnetdocs to confirm, one way or the other. [/quote] Let's just say we had a misunderstanding between all of us :P [/quote] I think this discussion is over, but mass quotes is fun. [/quote] Agreed. | December 21, 2003, 2:37 AM |
Adron | [quote author=Soul Taker link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36559 date=1071974226] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36557 date=1071971843] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36548 date=1071967917] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36544 date=1071967058] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36529 date=1071961349] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36528 date=1071961278] [quote author=UserLoser. link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36471 date=1071938370] [quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=4355;start=0#msg36459 date=1071930829] It's fairly obvious if you look at the rest of the packet. At least, it was to me. Information can be found on bnetdocs, if that's still alive http://www.valhallalegends.com/arta/bnetdocs [/quote] I don't understand [/quote] What don't you understand? You send out the name of a couple important files, and download them if the information returned is wrong. I think it's pretty obvious. [/quote] I don't understand is it's not on BnetDocs, yet you're supplying that URL even though they said they checked there And i do understand the packet as I stated above [/quote] Ah, well that was a simple mistake on my part. I didn't notice him say that, and I didn't go check bnetdocs to confirm, one way or the other. [/quote] Let's just say we had a misunderstanding between all of us :P [/quote] I think this discussion is over, but mass quotes is fun. [/quote] Agreed. [/quote] Hey! Why wasn't I invited to the quote party?! | December 21, 2003, 3:35 PM |