Does anybody happen to know what the flags are for blizzard represtentatives, guests, ect... I need them so my bot can disconnect if rep or somebody joins.

You might never see the representitive though!

That's pretty interesting. Why would you want to disconnect as soon as a rep joins?

That doesnt really make sense... What's the point of disconnecting when you see a rep?

[code]public:
   // Here are the flags used in channels
   static const DWORD OPERATOR_FLAG = 0x02;
   static const DWORD SPEAKER_FLAG = 0x04;
   static const DWORD SYSTEMADMIN_FLAG = 0x08;
   static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG = 0x10;
   static const DWORD SQUELCHED_FLAG = 0x20;
   static const DWORD SPECTATOR_FLAG = 0x40;[/code]

There! gogo give me karma! :-)

[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
There! gogo give me karma! :-)
[/quote]

What for? You didn't include blizzard representative!!1 :P

[quote author=Adron link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21790 date=1064058836]
[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
There! gogo give me karma! :-)
[/quote]

What for? You didn't include blizzard representative!!1 :P
[/quote]

SYSTEM_ADMIN is just as good :P

It seems like I'm missing Blizzard Staff .. Probably 0x80, then :)

[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21794 date=1064062282]
SYSTEM_ADMIN is just as good :P

It seems like I'm missing Blizzard Staff .. Probably 0x80, then :)
[/quote]

That would seem Unlikely ! 1 !

[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
[code] static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG = 0x10;[/code][/quote]This name is a bit misleading. While it does indicate the user is confined to chatting, it could be interpreted that the user is on a chatgate client (another correct, but incomplete interpretation). 0x10 technically specifies that the user did not indicate UDP support, which is true for all chatgate bots; it can also be true for game clients (or emulations thereof) which are connected to the network in such a way as to be unable to pass the test.

Memory might fail me, but didn't we use to name that constant NO_UDP_SUPPORT or something equally descriptive? Shows what happens people people change things they don't understand.

I would like to know the flags, so if somebody who has the power to lock an account or mute/void keys joins the channel, then they can disconnect before the admin/whoever finds out that it's a bot.

[quote author=BlazingKnight link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21814 date=1064078727]
I would like to know the flags, so if somebody who has the power to lock an account or mute/void keys joins the channel, then they can disconnect before the admin/whoever finds out that it's a bot.
[/quote]
[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
[code]
static const DWORD SYSTEMADMIN_FLAG = 0x08;[/code]
[/quote]

[quote author=BlazingKnight link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21814 date=1064078727]
I would like to know the flags, so if somebody who has the power to lock an account or mute/void keys joins the channel, then they can disconnect before the admin/whoever finds out that it's a bot.
[/quote]

Why not just avoid doing things that give away that you're a bot?

Why disable a bunch of functions when I can just disconnect?

[quote author=BlazingKnight link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21819 date=1064081639]
Why disable a bunch of functions when I can just disconnect?

[/quote]

That really seems like a last-resort stupid thing to do, and I think many people would agree with me.

Disable a bunch of functions? If you have that many features which someone can pick up on and recongize you're a bot, I suggest that you remove it all, because your bot obviously must be a one-man wrecking crew.

Right on.

[quote author=BlazingKnight link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21819 date=1064081639]
Why disable a bunch of functions when I can just disconnect?

[/quote]
Primarily Blizzard employees seem to prefer to go around with invisible mode on or as non-privileged accounts. If you're trying to hide from them, your solution is no solution at all.

First reply in the thread =P
[quote author=Soul Taker link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21767 date=1064043728]
You might never see the representitive though!
[/quote]

[quote author=Kp link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21802 date=1064071563]
[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
[code] static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG = 0x10;[/code][/quote]This name is a bit misleading. While it does indicate the user is confined to chatting, it could be interpreted that the user is on a chatgate client (another correct, but incomplete interpretation). 0x10 technically specifies that the user did not indicate UDP support, which is true for all chatgate bots; it can also be true for game clients (or emulations thereof) which are connected to the network in such a way as to be unable to pass the test.
[/quote]

hmm, I didn't name those myself. I *think* got them from spht, but I could be wrong.

[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=15#msg21831 date=1064089011]
[quote author=Kp link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21802 date=1064071563]
[quote author=iago link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=0#msg21782 date=1064056559]
[code] static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG = 0x10;[/code][/quote]This name is a bit misleading. While it does indicate the user is confined to chatting, it could be interpreted that the user is on a chatgate client (another correct, but incomplete interpretation). 0x10 technically specifies that the user did not indicate UDP support, which is true for all chatgate bots; it can also be true for game clients (or emulations thereof) which are connected to the network in such a way as to be unable to pass the test.
[/quote]

hmm, I didn't name those myself. I *think* got them from spht, but I could be wrong.
[/quote]

You never got them from me.

I'd say blame the Canadian... but, which one? :P

hmm, perhaps it was Arta then. I don't remember anymore..

maybe he wants to make a floodbot that floods BTS, so when he sees a rep there, it stops flooding.

[quote author=UserLoser link=board=17;threadid=2763;start=15#msg21838 date=1064094402]
maybe he wants to make a floodbot that floods BTS, so when he sees a rep there, it stops flooding.
[/quote]

Isn't there always a representative there?

Usually. Sometimes TechBot isn't there, unless it's hidden. Also it appears no reps are there, but who knows? :P