Valhalla Legends Forums Archive | Battle.net Bot Development | Packet logging

AuthorMessageTime
Lenny
Ive looked at packers of a few different bots all that directly connect to bnet with hashes.... Each one seems to have comletely diff sequence
and some packets arent defined in bnet docs such as 0x2D
July 8, 2003, 6:49 AM
Zakath
Which bots did you look at? That's kind of important. There IS more than one functional way to log on, but at this point there's the current way, and the old way. The old way isn't worth pursuing.
July 8, 2003, 12:16 PM
Camel
It is if you ever want to get JSTR working! =P
July 8, 2003, 10:32 PM
kamakazie
[quote author=Camel link=board=17;threadid=1832;start=0#msg14195 date=1057703557]
It is if you ever want to get JSTR working! =P
[/quote]

Or you can just look at JSTR's battle.snp and figure it out.
July 9, 2003, 2:32 AM
Camel
[quote author=kamakazie link=board=17;threadid=1832;start=0#msg14218 date=1057717972]
Or you can just look at JSTR's battle.snp and figure it out.
[/quote]

That would be persuing the old way.
July 9, 2003, 7:03 PM
RhiNo
or you could just do both ways hell why not beable to do 2 things instead of just 1
July 10, 2003, 7:11 PM
Camel
Because it's double the investment for almost zero return. The only reason I support JSTR is because when I origionally wrote my bot the old way was the only way. I saw no reason to remove the code I had. If I were to start over, I wouldn't bother.
July 10, 2003, 7:17 PM
RhiNo
its not 0 return its still more experience with VB if you are just starting or trying to learn more so it has its benefits
July 10, 2003, 7:19 PM
Camel
It gives zero return OVER the new login method.
July 11, 2003, 2:00 AM

Search