Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
BlazingKnight | What are the version bytes for all the clients? DRTL: DSHR: D2DV: D2XP: SSHR: STAR: SEXP: JSTR: W2BN: WAR3: W3XP: | July 8, 2003, 12:28 AM |
Spht | [quote author=BlazingKnight link=board=17;threadid=1827;start=0#msg14114 date=1057624080] What are the version bytes for all the clients? DRTL: DSHR: D2DV: D2XP: SSHR: STAR: SEXP: JSTR: W2BN: WAR3: W3XP: [/quote] [23:39:00] (BotNet) <From: BNLS> STAR c7 - SEXP c7 - W2BN 4f - D2DV 09 - D2XP 09 - JSTR a9 - WAR3 0a - W3XP 0a As for Diablo Retail, Starcraft Shareware, etc, I don't know. But besides, who cares about those anyway? | July 8, 2003, 1:55 AM |
DarkMinion | What's the point of even JSTR? I excluded everything in the latest version of my bot that can't join private channels. | July 8, 2003, 2:56 AM |
Camel | Are you kidding!? I use JSTR all the time! [quote]<BNU-Camel> Hey DavidN, what the fuck is up!? <DavidN> Not much, what's up with you my JSTR buddy!?[/quote] Yeah ok, so that never happened; but still. Hrm, what ever happened to DavidN? He was cool. :( | July 8, 2003, 5:25 AM |
Arta | BnetDocs has all the current version bytes and product codes. | July 8, 2003, 4:09 PM |
Grok | [quote author=Arta[vL] link=board=17;threadid=1827;start=0#msg14169 date=1057680582] BnetDocs has all the current version bytes and product codes. [/quote] Hmm, is Bnetdocs still around? Does it still force people to register to see the content? If so, why? It sounds like the Patriot Act where the government tries to monitor who is reading what. Real Farenheit-451 stuff. | July 9, 2003, 10:50 AM |
Eternal | Bnetdocs is a great source so you deserve much credit for it. Is it just me, or do others find it very slow to navigate/access? | July 9, 2003, 11:35 AM |
BlazingKnight | That book blows. We had to read it in summer school. It's like something I would have read in 5th grade. | July 9, 2003, 1:43 PM |
Eternal | Book? :o | July 9, 2003, 1:47 PM |
DarkMinion | I believe he is referring to Farenheit-451 | July 9, 2003, 4:38 PM |
Eternal | Ahh...ok, thanks. Completely missed that one. | July 9, 2003, 4:40 PM |
Camel | [quote author=Grok link=board=17;threadid=1827;start=0#msg14254 date=1057747836] [quote author=Arta[vL] link=board=17;threadid=1827;start=0#msg14169 date=1057680582] BnetDocs has all the current version bytes and product codes. [/quote] Hmm, is Bnetdocs still around? Does it still force people to register to see the content? If so, why? It sounds like the Patriot Act where the government tries to monitor who is reading what. Real Farenheit-451 stuff. [/quote] Big difference: The govornment has no business prying into our personal business without a warrant (see: Fourth ammendment). However, BnetDocs is private and therefore does not fall under the Fourth Ammendment's scope -- this was an intentional part of the ammendments. The Patriot Act to me -- even as an admitted Libertarian -- is in clear violation of the Fourth Ammendment, as it bends the definition of probable cause, while BnetDocs is not. By the way, the reason Bush can get around the Fourt Ammdendment is because he issued an Executive Order allowing warrents to be issued under new conditions for new reasons affecting larger areas; I won't get too specific as it is not relevant. Fourth Ammendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons houses and papers against unreasonable search and seisures shall not be violated and no warrent shall issued but upon probable cause." Simply put, it is our right to privacy. | July 9, 2003, 7:30 PM |