Just for fun!

Where's (e) There's no right answer?

Valhalla Legends is the subject, Battle.net is the object, clan is the subject's descriptor.

Not to mention "is" is the verb and "a" is an "indefinite article" . I think that covers just about everything!

No, no, no people! You must use the answers provided!

That looks familiar

Why would we think inside the box when outside has so many more possibilities?

[quote author=Andy link=topic=17452.msg177692#msg177692 date=1208289479]
Why would we think inside the box when outside has so many more possibilities?
[/quote]

You are obviously not worthy. Ever read other sections of vL website?

Nope. Never been interested in clans.

[quote author=Andy link=topic=17452.msg177697#msg177697 date=1208291758]
Nope. Never been interested in clans.
[/quote]

Yet you are here.

I'm here because HDX told me it would be the place to get information on BNCS. Which it has.

[quote author=Spht link=topic=17452.msg177689#msg177689 date=1208286991]
That looks familiar
[/quote]

Think it was on valhallalegends.com somewhere. Pretty sure.

[quote author=Andy link=topic=17452.msg177704#msg177704 date=1208295981]
I'm here because HDX told me it would be the place to get information on BNCS. Which it has.
[/quote]

no, that's not here. that's bnetdocs.

I said information, not documentation. And it was... once.

It's on our "about" page, come on!

http://www.valhallalegends.com/aboutvL.asp

I instantly recognized it. :)

afaik, vL has been long dead on battle.net, even the acc [vL] has been dead on bnet for a long time as well.
Its got the best bnet bot dev forum I have ever come across tho.

Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (.time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1

[quote author=Spht link=topic=17452.msg177747#msg177747 date=1208398260]
Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (like .time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1
[/quote]
I hope it will a bit before Starcraft 2 comes out.

[quote author=Spht link=topic=17452.msg177747#msg177747 date=1208398260]
Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (.time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1
[/quote]
SILC.

If you don't like it, why are you still there?

This forum is Diablo USA-1?

[quote author=iago link=topic=17452.msg177750#msg177750 date=1208398970]
SILC.
[/quote]

I couldn't find a decent non-bloated client for it and have no interest writing my own

The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people

except, there's more than a password stopping people from getting on battle.net. you have to have a cdkey, correct game versions, etc, if you're wanting to use a bot. if you're not using a bot, then chatting for long periods of time is pretty painful.

so, if about ease-of-access is your motivation, then silc or irc is generally much, much better.

[quote author=Spht link=topic=17452.msg177761#msg177761 date=1208458722]
[quote author=iago link=topic=17452.msg177750#msg177750 date=1208398970]
SILC.
[/quote]

I couldn't find a decent non-bloated client for it and have no interest writing my own

The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people
[/quote]

I like the irssi-based client, although I also like irssi, so maybe that's why.

It's possible (I think?) to have a non-passworded channel on SILC.

[quote author=Spht link=topic=17452.msg177761#msg177761 date=1208458722]
The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people
[/quote]

Probably won't happen until SC2 comes out dude... So far this year I haven't even been going on TFT to play Dota. Maybe if I don't go camping this weekend~ :-\