| Author | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| LockesRabb | Think of bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com. What internet browser did you prefer to use while viewing that site? Do you ever access the bnetdocs via a wireless device such as a cell phone, PDA, sidekick, blackberry, etc? If you could access a mini-version of the bnetdocs via a mobile device, would you make use of it, or would this feature be entirely unneeded? Was there anything in the bnetdocs site that was missing that you wished they had? If so, what? Was there something the bnetdocs had that you felt they should have done without? I'm just curious to hear your thoughts. :) | April 12, 2007, 12:55 AM |
| Hell-Lord | FireFox is my first preference. | April 12, 2007, 1:04 AM |
| Barabajagal | Why the hell would you need a mobile BNetDocs? I don't think programming on a cell phone is likely, or efficient. | April 12, 2007, 1:23 AM |
| Denial | oh crap my bot isnt working on my cell phone im so lucky i can access bnet docs from my phone!!! Firefox. | April 12, 2007, 1:48 AM |
| Barabajagal | O.o there's cell phone bots? That's a bit much... | April 12, 2007, 1:54 AM |
| LockesRabb | Actually, most cell phones use Java midlets. OpBot (not sure of the name) was coded in java, so it with some modification should be usable on cell phones. | April 12, 2007, 2:23 AM |
| SNiFFeR | I use Firefox, Safari and sometimes my sidekick to view the forums. I personally prefer Firefox but I'm usually bored and out, so I'll browse on the sidekick. And when I'm not at home on the Mac. | April 12, 2007, 3:24 AM |
| UserLoser | [quote author=Kyro link=topic=16606.msg167851#msg167851 date=1176339310] Think of bnetdocs.valhallalegends.com. What internet browser did you prefer to use while viewing that site? Do you ever access the bnetdocs via a wireless device such as a cell phone, PDA, sidekick, blackberry, etc? If you could access a mini-version of the bnetdocs via a mobile device, would you make use of it, or would this feature be entirely unneeded? Was there anything in the bnetdocs site that was missing that you wished they had? If so, what? Was there something the bnetdocs had that you felt they should have done without? I'm just curious to hear your thoughts. :) [/quote] wtf... IE | April 12, 2007, 8:55 PM |
| ArtofMurder | Opera. | April 13, 2007, 12:00 AM |
| rabbit | IE and "other" are getting owned. | April 13, 2007, 12:25 AM |
| Denial | eww javaop? phpbot for the win :) | April 13, 2007, 12:52 AM |
| JoeTheOdd | [quote author=ŖėåłïťŷŔĩρρŀě link=topic=16606.msg167855#msg167855 date=1176341000] Why the hell would you need a mobile BNetDocs? I don't think programming on a cell phone is likely, or efficient. [/quote] Not everyone can afford dual monitors. | April 13, 2007, 2:33 AM |
| Barabajagal | what...? | April 13, 2007, 2:45 AM |
| Denial | I think hes saying not everyone can afford expensive stuff unlike us | April 13, 2007, 6:53 AM |
| Barabajagal | I can't afford expensive stuff... My family spent all its money on property and our power system (solar panels, batteries, a propane generator, and the best inverter money can buy). I have a single 17" LCD monitor that cost me $200, and I had to work for it myself. Same with the rest of my system. I don't understand what it has to do with using a cell phone to view BNetDocs. | April 13, 2007, 7:06 AM |
| SNiFFeR | Yeah, cell phones capable of internet browsing is cheap. haha :P. | April 13, 2007, 8:34 AM |
| Myndfyr | [quote author=ŖėåłïťŷŔĩρρŀě link=topic=16606.msg167857#msg167857 date=1176342880] O.o there's cell phone bots? That's a bit much... [/quote] Doing so can teach you quite a bit about efficient design. My first bot API was ported to the smart device platform and ran on smartphones and PDAs that ran Windows Mobile 2003 with the .NET Compact Framework. | April 13, 2007, 11:12 PM |
| MyStiCaL | i perfer IE on some things and firefox on others. | April 14, 2007, 11:27 PM |