Valhalla Legends Forums Archive | Battle.net Bot Development | Bug in BNLS_VERSIONCHECKEX2?

AuthorMessageTime
dRAgoN
I've noticed a few times now the the function isn't allways sending the current version byte is it soposed to be like this?
November 26, 2006, 11:35 AM
HeRo
I wouldn't think so.
November 26, 2006, 12:07 PM
HdxBmx27
Can you post some packet logs?
~-~(HDX)~-~
November 26, 2006, 4:20 PM
Skywing
Psychic debugging suggests that you might be doing something unwise like assuming the exeinfo string returned by BNLS is always 16 bytes long for lockdown.
November 26, 2006, 5:00 PM
zorm
Pulling out the Raymond Chen moves now Skywing?! I <3 You.
November 26, 2006, 5:51 PM
dRAgoN
[quote author=Skywing link=topic=16077.msg161823#msg161823 date=1164560429]
Psychic debugging suggests that you might be doing something unwise like assuming the exeinfo string returned by BNLS is always 16 bytes long for lockdown.
[/quote]
[code]01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D   ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 CF 00 00   œ:.9‹á}?.....Ï..
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                           ................
01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D   ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   œ:.9‹á}?........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                           ................
01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D   ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   œ:.9‹á}?........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                           ................
01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D   ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   œ:.9‹á}?........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                           ................
01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D   ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00   œ:.9‹á}?........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00                           ................[/code]
November 26, 2006, 10:38 PM
Ersan
Are those all during the same session?
November 26, 2006, 10:40 PM
dRAgoN
No connected recieved disconnected for all of those. I was useing the same values though heh.
November 26, 2006, 10:43 PM
dRAgoN
[code]Data Minus the header.

01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D  ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00            œ:.9‹á}?........

01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D  ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00            œ:.9‹á}?........

01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D  ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00            œ:.9‹á}?........

01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D  ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00 CF 00 00  œ:.9‹á}?.....Ï..
00 00 00 00 00                                    ................

01 00 0E 01 8B 64 2B 3C B3 65 9C 55 43 2A 5F 9D  ....‹d+<³eœUC*_?
9C 3A 09 39 8B E1 7D 8F 00 00 00 00 00            œ:.9‹á}?........[/code]
more dumps
November 26, 2006, 11:47 PM
UserLoser
Where are logs of what you're sending?
November 27, 2006, 4:30 AM
Skywing
This should be fixed.  There was a problem with how version code information was being sent to clients when a particular version check result was sent from the cache instead of being computed on the fly.
November 27, 2006, 5:25 AM
dRAgoN
[quote author=Skywing link=topic=16077.msg161872#msg161872 date=1164605106]
This should be fixed.  There was a problem with how version code information was being sent to clients when a particular version check result was sent from the cache instead of being computed on the fly.
[/quote]
Knew you would find it ;)
November 27, 2006, 6:09 AM
bethra
Skywing, you're my hero!  I wanna be more like you!

/suckupoff
November 27, 2006, 6:27 PM

Search