Is there a BCP that logs all users seen by the bot (joins/parts) and adds a /seen alias, by any chance? (to be used in conjunction with oper)

Edit: If it doesn't, is it possible with the plugin framework skywing devised?

Edit again: it seems to be, is there any more documentation on this framework?

Edit: Back again, am I to assume that the eventhook isn't implemented yet and that you have to parse the data yourself using the messagehook?

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155964#msg155964 date=1153570767]Is there a BCP that logs all users seen by the bot (joins/parts) and adds a /seen alias, by any chance? (to be used in conjunction with oper)[/quote]

Not that I know of.

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155964#msg155964 date=1153570767]Edit: If it doesn't, is it possible with the plugin framework skywing devised?[/quote]

Of course.

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155964#msg155964 date=1153570767]Edit again: it seems to be, is there any more documentation on this framework?[/quote]

Yeah... http://www.valhallalegends.com/pub/BCP/SDK/

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155964#msg155964 date=1153570767]Edit: Back again, am I to assume that the eventhook isn't implemented yet and that you have to parse the data yourself using the messagehook?[/quote]

I agree, you should use MessageHook.

Isn't that basically writing a packetbuffer in a plugin of a program that already has a packetbuffer?

BYTE MessageId
^^ any hints as to what that is?  is it just a cookie?  or is it some sort of packet identifier?  Documentation for the propietary plugin framework might be fun.

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155982#msg155982 date=1153608678]
Isn't that basically writing a packetbuffer in a plugin of a program that already has a packetbuffer?

BYTE MessageId
^^ any hints as to what that is?  is it just a cookie?  or is it some sort of packet identifier?  Documentation for the propietary plugin framework might be fun.
[/quote]

It is probably the message id of the incoming packet...  It is what it says, if it had stated "cookie" it would be the cookie.  Do you also want to know what MessageLength and MessageData mean too?

No, those were pretty self-explanitory.  It does in fact state 'MessageId' not 'PacketId' - by the way.

I appreciate the attitude.

[quote author=Ersan link=topic=15430.msg155987#msg155987 date=1153625973]
No, those were pretty self-explanitory.  It does in fact state 'MessageId' not 'PacketId' - by the way.

I appreciate the attitude.
[/quote]

Yeah, I know it says MessageId, not PacketId.  What's your point?

That you were an ass because it wasn't completely obvious that it was a packet, as message could mean several things, as can identity, including "cookie" as one of them.

WOW JOE YOU REALLY CAME TO ERSAN'S RESCUE!

Jesus Christ, I didn't even notice that was Ersan.

PS: Hi Warrior. And Hi Ersan.

You're an idiot.

A month later, and you defend Ersan.

*sigh*

More like two days. Ersan is cool, back off UL!

Seriously though, hi Ersan. And Newby.