Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
CrAz3D | http://www.colorado.edu/police/ PWNED lol | May 4, 2006, 3:15 AM |
Forged | people have too much time on their hands. | May 4, 2006, 3:17 AM |
Myndfyr | [quote] On 4-20-2006 University officials closed Farrand Field from 12 Noon until 5 PM. The field was closed off with barricades, yellow jacketed "event staff" personnel and police officers. [/quote] If the field was closed off, how did so many people get there? | May 4, 2006, 3:20 AM |
Topaz | [quote author=MyndFyre[vL] link=topic=14929.msg151939#msg151939 date=1146712817] [quote] On 4-20-2006 University officials closed Farrand Field from 12 Noon until 5 PM. The field was closed off with barricades, yellow jacketed "event staff" personnel and police officers. [/quote] If the field was closed off, how did so many people get there? [/quote] Enforcement of that, I guess... police usually just fence or tape the area off, but you can just climb over it. | May 4, 2006, 3:32 AM |
Newby | That's great. | May 4, 2006, 1:31 PM |
K | Police posted signs all around the field that it would be closed from noon to 5 or 6. There were yellow jacketed "event staff" on the field. THe signs clearly stated that video surveilence was in use and violators would be referred to judicial affairs. Around 3-4 o'clock, when the hippies were at their strongest, they simply walked onto the field. They so outnumbered the "event staff" that any attempt to keep them off the field might have been a bad idea -- I mean, how many riots has CU had in the past couple years? The signs were clearly posted and these people took the chance anyway, and now they're paying for it. Too bad I don't know any of the people on the page, or I might turn some in for $50 a pop. | May 4, 2006, 4:24 PM |
Twix | Now this reminds me why I got this shirt [img]http://www.rapindustry.com/stop-snitchinx.jpg[/img] | May 4, 2006, 9:10 PM |
Disco | Snitches are a dying breed... | May 4, 2006, 9:13 PM |
CrAz3D | [quote author=DeTaiLs link=topic=14929.msg151971#msg151971 date=1146777011] Now this reminds me why I got this shirt [img]http://www.rapindustry.com/stop-snitchinx.jpg[/img] [/quote]Reporting criminals with blatant disregard for the law isn't snitching ;) | May 4, 2006, 10:49 PM |
MrRaza | [quote author=CrAz3D link=topic=14929.msg151975#msg151975 date=1146782981] [quote author=DeTaiLs link=topic=14929.msg151971#msg151971 date=1146777011] Now this reminds me why I got this shirt [img]http://www.rapindustry.com/stop-snitchinx.jpg[/img] [/quote]Reporting criminals with blatant disregard for the law isn't snitching ;) [/quote] Your a bitch | May 4, 2006, 11:49 PM |
K | Obviously I wouldn't turn in anyone I liked. If I saw some kids on there that I disliked, they'd be fair game. Of course, I would wager that almost all of them are freshmen. | May 5, 2006, 12:54 AM |
CrAz3D | [quote author=MrRaza link=topic=14929.msg151981#msg151981 date=1146786544] [quote author=CrAz3D link=topic=14929.msg151975#msg151975 date=1146782981] [quote author=DeTaiLs link=topic=14929.msg151971#msg151971 date=1146777011] Now this reminds me why I got this shirt [img]http://www.rapindustry.com/stop-snitchinx.jpg[/img] [/quote]Reporting criminals with blatant disregard for the law isn't snitching ;) [/quote] Your a bitch [/quote] *You ARE a bitch? ;) I don't think most of them are freshmen, there might be alot, but from what I hear from a dude that went there people go to that alot | May 5, 2006, 1:46 AM |
hismajesty | K went last year iirc. | May 5, 2006, 2:02 AM |
K | [quote author=hismajesty[yL] link=topic=14929.msg151995#msg151995 date=1146794523] K went last year iirc. [/quote] I was there when I was a freshman. I've walked by it for the last two years, but never had any interest in going again ;) | May 5, 2006, 3:54 AM |
CrAz3D | [quote author=K link=topic=14929.msg152005#msg152005 date=1146801274] [quote author=hismajesty[yL] link=topic=14929.msg151995#msg151995 date=1146794523] K went last year iirc. [/quote] I was there when I was a freshman. I've walked by it for the last two years, but never had any interest in going again ;) [/quote]heh | May 5, 2006, 5:33 AM |
CrAz3D | May 11, 2006, 3:13 AM | |
Twix | I am glad somebody took action and I support them 100%. Even if they where doing criminal acitivity it gives the police no right to put the pictures all over sites so other people can see it such as family members and friends. | May 11, 2006, 4:06 AM |
CrAz3D | [quote author=DeTaiLs link=topic=14929.msg152303#msg152303 date=1147320417] I am glad somebody took action and I support them 100%. Even if they where doing criminal acitivity it gives the police no right to put the pictures all over sites so other people can see it such as family members and friends. [/quote] What could the kids possibly be suing for?...defamation? Its EXACTLY the same as posting a "wanted" poster | May 11, 2006, 4:13 AM |
Newby | [quote author=DeTaiLs link=topic=14929.msg152303#msg152303 date=1147320417] I am glad somebody took action and I support them 100%. Even if they where doing criminal acitivity it gives the police no right to put the pictures all over sites so other people can see it such as family members and friends. [/quote] As CrAz3D said, it's basically a wanted poster. It said they were guilty of trespassing (which, according to TehUser, is a class 5 felony if you willingly do it (source: IRC)) and probably marijuana smoking, though that'll be harder to prove. Basically: threaten 'em with a felony, they'll rat out their friends. | May 11, 2006, 1:13 PM |
CrAz3D | Posession of paraphenilia is usually worse than possession of the drug, depending on how much of the drug you have...at least thats how it goes in NM | May 11, 2006, 2:26 PM |
K | From what I've heard and seen on the news, the issue is one of civil liberties, specifically the right to assemble peaceably. The university closed the field -- public property -- in advance in order to prevent a peaceful gathering from occuring. The second claim I've heard is that by not arresting people as soon as they set foot on the field, the university gave "implied consent" that such a gathering was ok. As a funny aside, I watched the FoxNewsVersion[sup]tm[/sup] of the incident, where the mentioned that the participents "claimed that their civil liberties had been violated!" but then immediately cut to an interview which totally mentioned nothing about said violation. In fact, that was the only line that mentioned the actual issue at all. ;) Edit: How 'bout fix the link so that the tables aren't all screwed up? | May 11, 2006, 4:06 PM |
CrAz3D | I believe you have to apply for permits for large gathers, for safety measures & what not. "implied consent"?...that seems like a bullshit excuse. Just because there are speed limits posted without a cop at each one doesn't mean they still don't apply | May 11, 2006, 5:50 PM |