Valhalla Legends Forums Archive | Battle.net Bot Development | [C++] UI for a Moderation Bot

AuthorMessageTime
David
I think it's pointless and defeats the purpose of a moderation bot.
April 11, 2006, 9:51 PM
Yegg
[quote author=David link=topic=14751.msg150439#msg150439 date=1144792264]
I think it's pointless and defeats the purpose of a moderation bot.
[/quote]

It is all a matter of opinion.
April 11, 2006, 10:53 PM
warz
Depends, really. If you plan on just loading it and letting it sit for days on end without having to manually edit anything on it, then no, a ui would be sort of unecessary.
April 11, 2006, 11:19 PM
Spht
How do you expect users to communicate with the bot if there is no UI?

I think you meant GUI, in which case it is not necessary, but convinent for debugging.
April 11, 2006, 11:28 PM
rabbit
A removable GUI is nice.  JavaOp and JavaOp2 both have this feature, which allows it to act as either a pure moderation bot or a hybrid for chatting.
April 12, 2006, 12:11 AM
JoeTheOdd
Seeing as how there's no option for a neutral oppinion, I picked "Who Cares?".

Personally, I'd like a bot that gives the option to the user; not to just hide the UI, but destroy it's objects, such as FoolOps and JavaOp do.
April 12, 2006, 12:11 AM
Topaz
Why'd you make a topic like this?
April 12, 2006, 12:36 AM
JoeTheOdd
To collect people's opinions. We all know Furious couldn't program his way out of a DRY paper bag if his life depended on it. <3 Furious.
April 12, 2006, 12:43 AM
David
[quote author=Topaz link=topic=14751.msg150455#msg150455 date=1144802169]
Why'd you make a topic like this?
[/quote]

To get a public opinion, I was curious of peoples thoughts on the issue.
April 12, 2006, 12:59 AM
Twix
[quote author=Topaz link=topic=14751.msg150455#msg150455 date=1144802169]
Why'd you make a topic like this?
[/quote]
Because he is a waste of sperm so he figured he be a waste of bandwidth at the same time, jp <3 furious.
April 12, 2006, 1:13 AM
Spht
[quote author=David link=topic=14751.msg150461#msg150461 date=1144803574]
[quote author=Topaz link=topic=14751.msg150455#msg150455 date=1144802169]
Why'd you make a topic like this?
[/quote]

To get a public opinion, I was curious of peoples thoughts on the issue.
[/quote]

I'm not sure why you would poll for opinions on this.

It's up to the developer.  Obviously having a GUI is more convenient for maintaining the bot, otherwise administrators would have to access the bot through the UI over Battle.net (or Botnet, or whatever else), which is less convenient.  It's pretty typical that users/consumers are going to want a product that can be used efficiently and easily.

It's like asking someone if they would like a vehicle with a remote car key, or without.
April 12, 2006, 1:24 AM
bethra
It's really up to you, the programmer.

It may vary on who the intended userbase is too.  If it's for personal use only, then no GUI with a console type UI may be perfectly fine.  However if it's intended to be used by others for the public to use, then a GUI is the way to go since it in general is easier to use and the average user tends to prefer a GUI over console type UI in general.  I believe that in the way of popularity, a GUI is a must as well.

EDIT:  Meh, most of what I said has already been said, oh well.
April 12, 2006, 3:21 PM
Adron
The question is UI or no UI, not GUI... I find it would be strange for a bot to have no interface to the user, including no whispered commands, no text output, and no way to start or stop it.
April 12, 2006, 9:13 PM
Spht
[quote author=Adron link=topic=14751.msg150510#msg150510 date=1144876419]
The question is UI or no UI, not GUI... I find it would be strange for a bot to have no interface to the user, including no whispered commands, no text output, and no way to start or stop it.
[/quote]

Yes, which is why I'm thinking he meant GUI.  A bot with no UI is like a dog that doesn't obey.
April 12, 2006, 10:43 PM
bethra
[quote author=Spht link=topic=14751.msg150514#msg150514 date=1144881782]
[quote author=Adron link=topic=14751.msg150510#msg150510 date=1144876419]
The question is UI or no UI, not GUI... I find it would be strange for a bot to have no interface to the user, including no whispered commands, no text output, and no way to start or stop it.
[/quote]

Yes, which is why I'm thinking he meant GUI.  A bot with no UI is like a dog that doesn't obey.
[/quote]Yeah... I was assuming that the poster really meant GUI as well :\
April 12, 2006, 11:00 PM
warz
[quote author=Spht link=topic=14751.msg150514#msg150514 date=1144881782]
Yes, which is why I'm thinking he meant GUI.  A bot with no UI is like a dog that doesn't obey.
[/quote]

[quote]
It's like asking someone if they would like a vehicle with a remote car key, or without.[/quote]

lol
April 13, 2006, 2:19 AM
Spht
[quote author=warz link=topic=14751.msg150519#msg150519 date=1144894768]
[quote author=Spht link=topic=14751.msg150514#msg150514 date=1144881782]
Yes, which is why I'm thinking he meant GUI.  A bot with no UI is like a dog that doesn't obey.
[/quote]

[quote]
It's like asking someone if they would like a vehicle with a remote car key, or without.[/quote]

lol
[/quote]

You quoting me is like walking up to a guy and repeating everything he says.
April 13, 2006, 2:32 AM
Explicit[nK]
[quote author=Spht link=topic=14751.msg150521#msg150521 date=1144895559]
[quote author=warz link=topic=14751.msg150519#msg150519 date=1144894768]
[quote author=Spht link=topic=14751.msg150514#msg150514 date=1144881782]
Yes, which is why I'm thinking he meant GUI. A bot with no UI is like a dog that doesn't obey.
[/quote]

[quote]
It's like asking someone if they would like a vehicle with a remote car key, or without.[/quote]

lol
[/quote]

You quoting me is like walking up to a guy and repeating everything he says.
[/quote]

I <3 ya, Spht.
April 13, 2006, 3:01 AM
JoeTheOdd
[quote author=Adron link=topic=14751.msg150510#msg150510 date=1144876419]
The question is UI or no UI, not GUI... I find it would be strange for a bot to have no interface to the user, including no whispered commands, no text output, and no way to start or stop it.
[/quote]

Sounds a lot like a process. :p
April 13, 2006, 8:06 AM
Zakath
A process? Any program is a process. How does the UI or lack thereof have anything to do with a program's process-ness?
April 14, 2006, 2:02 AM
JoeTheOdd
I meant a service. Again, excuse my lack of thinking. =/
April 14, 2006, 2:40 AM
David
[quote author=J link=topic=14751.msg150588#msg150588 date=1144982405]
I meant a service. Again, excuse my lack of thinking. =/
[/quote]

Actually, it runs as a Windows Service.
April 15, 2006, 8:15 PM
UserLoser
[quote author=J link=topic=14751.msg150588#msg150588 date=1144982405]
I meant a service. Again, excuse my lack of thinking. =/
[/quote]

Just because something runs as a service doesn't mean the UI is invisible to the user, whether it's graphical or not.
April 15, 2006, 9:13 PM
Myndfyr
[quote author=David link=topic=14751.msg150635#msg150635 date=1145132158]
[quote author=J link=topic=14751.msg150588#msg150588 date=1144982405]
I meant a service. Again, excuse my lack of thinking. =/
[/quote]

Actually, it runs as a Windows Service.
[/quote]

It could run as a daemon (via fork()) in Linux/UNIX.
April 15, 2006, 10:05 PM
iago
What's this have to do with "C++"?
April 16, 2006, 11:01 PM
JoeTheOdd
He's probably going to try to write a project in C++, but other than for his own sake, probably nothing.
April 17, 2006, 11:12 PM
David
[quote author=iago link=topic=14751.msg150691#msg150691 date=1145228464]
What's this have to do with "C++"?
[/quote]

Most of the public moderation bots you find are written in Visual Basic and have a GUI, basic or not, C++ ( in this case ) would require hours of un-needed work to make a GUI for a moderation bot which IMO is not needed, correct?
April 28, 2006, 10:12 PM
Quarantine
hours?
April 28, 2006, 10:18 PM
rabbit
If you do it well, hours is quite reasonable.
April 28, 2006, 11:41 PM

Search