Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
rabbit | Well, Pontifex is an encryption schema from the book Cryptonomicon (which is really good, btw). Just thought I'd share: [pre]#!/usr/bin/perl -s $f = $d ? -1 : 1; $D = pack('C*', 33..86); $p = shift; $p = ~y/A-Z/; $U = '$D = ~s/(.*)u$/U$1/; $D = ~s/U(.)/$1U/;'; ($V = $U) = ~s/U/V/g; $p = ~s/[A-Z]/$k = ord(#&) - 64, & e/eg; $k = 0; while(<>) { y/a-z/A-Z/; y/A=Z//dc; $o .= $_ } $o .= 'X' while length($o) %5 && !$d; $o = ~s/./chr(($f * &e + ord($&) - 13) %26 + 65/eg; $o = ~s/X*$// if $d; $o = ~s /.{5}/$& /g; print "$o\n"; sub v { $v = ord(substr($D, $_[0])) - 32; $v > 53 ? 53 : $v; } sub w { eval "$U$V$V"; $D = ~s/(.*)([UV].*[UV])(.*)/$3$2$1/; &w(&v(53)); $k ? (&w($k)) : ($c = &v(&v(0)), $c > 52 ? &e : $c) }[/pre] Actually, I'm not even sure if it works, but it looks interesting! | January 15, 2006, 3:26 PM |
Yegg | It looks incredibly difficult to follow, but I dont know Perl either. | January 15, 2006, 4:19 PM |
iago | There are many lines in it that look like they're there solely to make it difficult to understand the code. They do operations that could very easily be done a different way in a complex way. That's not a good sign for an encryption scheme. Also, how does it work? Where is the key and what is it encrypting? | January 15, 2006, 5:32 PM |
rabbit | January 15, 2006, 6:27 PM | |
iago | [quote author=rabbit link=topic=13920.msg141933#msg141933 date=1137349675] The key is user supplied, and it encrypts plaintext. An example is here. [/quote] Why, exactly, do I get a JavaScript error, "ActiveXObject Undefined"? That's ewwy :) | January 15, 2006, 7:13 PM |
Yegg | [quote author=iago link=topic=13920.msg141934#msg141934 date=1137352418] [quote author=rabbit link=topic=13920.msg141933#msg141933 date=1137349675] The key is user supplied, and it encrypts plaintext. An example is here. [/quote] Why, exactly, do I get a JavaScript error, "ActiveXObject Undefined"? That's ewwy :) [/quote] It doesn't work at all for me. I don't even receive an error. What browser are you using? I'm on Mozilla Suite. | January 15, 2006, 7:54 PM |
rabbit | Old link. Try the new one. It didn't work for me in Firefox, so I looked (and found) a new one: http://www.erobillard.com/Content/solitaire/ | January 15, 2006, 8:03 PM |
iago | The reason it didn't work was that it was in (eww!) ActiveX :) | January 15, 2006, 11:34 PM |
rabbit | Yeah. Eww indeed. It doesn't even really match what the original scheme was anyway :\ O well. | January 16, 2006, 3:15 AM |
Topaz | I read Cryptonomicon, and I found it sucky. You wasted ten of my dollars, rabbit :( | January 17, 2006, 3:48 AM |
rabbit | Pfft! You obviously suck at life then. Cryptonomicon is awesome. | January 18, 2006, 3:44 AM |