Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
Spilled[DW] | Im creating a client connection in C++ and im having problems packetlogging. I can see outgoing packets but not incoming from the server. I am using WPEPro as my packet logger. Any ideas why i cannot see incoming? Thanks in advance. | October 17, 2005, 5:14 AM |
kamakazie | Are you sure that there is any actual incoming data? Are you filtering the stream in your packet logger? | October 17, 2005, 7:08 AM |
Spilled[DW] | yes i am sure i am getting data because im detecting 0x25 in my parsep and echoing it back and there is no filter on my WPEpro... | October 17, 2005, 7:28 AM |
shout | Are you using WSA functions? Sometimes WPE has trouble with those, or at least it has for me. | October 17, 2005, 12:12 PM |
Spilled[DW] | i use recv, not WSARecv is that what you meant? If you would like code, let me know. | October 17, 2005, 2:20 PM |
Kp | Why're you using WPE instead of Ethereal? | October 18, 2005, 12:59 AM |
shout | [quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131393#msg131393 date=1129597186] Why're you using WPE instead of Ethereal? [/quote] Probably because WPE is eaiser to use. :/ | October 18, 2005, 3:50 AM |
Kp | [quote author=Shout link=topic=13055.msg131418#msg131418 date=1129607454][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131393#msg131393 date=1129597186]Why're you using WPE instead of Ethereal?[/quote]Probably because WPE is eaiser to use. :/[/quote] I disagree. For one thing, WPE doesn't even run. It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image. Ethereal, on the other hand, works fine. It can even sniff its own display activity, which leads to all sorts of strange and wonderful behavior. | October 18, 2005, 11:44 PM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131486#msg131486 date=1129679051] It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image. [/quote] Try the WINE loader. :P | October 18, 2005, 11:51 PM |
Kp | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=13055.msg131491#msg131491 date=1129679479][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131486#msg131486 date=1129679051]It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image.[/quote]Try the WINE loader. :P[/quote] Why? WPE still won't be able to sniff the network. That would require CAP_NET_ADMIN permissions, and there's no way I'm giving that to an X program! | October 18, 2005, 11:55 PM |
shout | [quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131494#msg131494 date=1129679710] [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=13055.msg131491#msg131491 date=1129679479][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131486#msg131486 date=1129679051]It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image.[/quote]Try the WINE loader. :P[/quote] Why? WPE still won't be able to sniff the network. That would require CAP_NET_ADMIN permissions, and there's no way I'm giving that to an X program! [/quote] I may be going out on a limb, but I don't think he is using linux. | October 19, 2005, 12:41 AM |
Explicit[nK] | [quote author=Shout link=topic=13055.msg131503#msg131503 date=1129682517] [quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131494#msg131494 date=1129679710] [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=13055.msg131491#msg131491 date=1129679479][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131486#msg131486 date=1129679051]It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image.[/quote]Try the WINE loader. :P[/quote] Why? WPE still won't be able to sniff the network. That would require CAP_NET_ADMIN permissions, and there's no way I'm giving that to an X program! [/quote] I may be going out on a limb, but I don't think he is using linux. [/quote] You're not going out on a limb; he is using Windows. | October 19, 2005, 12:53 AM |
Kp | [quote author=Explicit[nK] link=topic=13055.msg131506#msg131506 date=1129683237][quote author=Shout link=topic=13055.msg131503#msg131503 date=1129682517][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131494#msg131494 date=1129679710][quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=13055.msg131491#msg131491 date=1129679479][quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131486#msg131486 date=1129679051]It's not a recognized by the ELF loader as a valid image.[/quote]Try the WINE loader. :P[/quote]Why? WPE still won't be able to sniff the network. That would require CAP_NET_ADMIN permissions, and there's no way I'm giving that to an X program![/quote]I may be going out on a limb, but I don't think he is using linux.[/quote]You're not going out on a limb; he is using Windows.[/quote] Which is entirely irrelevant. Ethereal works fine on Windows and on Linux. You can run it either place, capture live, or capture to a file and view it later. You can even take the capture on a Linux system and view it from Windows, or vice versa. I, on the other hand, am using Linux, which is why WPE seems like such a silly idea. Not only is it platform specific, but it wouldn't work for me and apparently isn't working particularly well for him. :) | October 19, 2005, 1:34 AM |
Explicit[nK] | Shout and I were both referring to WPE Pro. :P | October 19, 2005, 1:35 AM |
Kp | [quote author=Explicit[nK] link=topic=13055.msg131514#msg131514 date=1129685751]Shout and I were both referring to WPE Pro. :P[/quote] Why? We've already established that it's an inferior product for its lack of cross-platform support, as well as its lack of support for WSA calls. Next you're going to tell me it can't even write its capture results to a standard format file? | October 19, 2005, 3:31 AM |
Spilled[DW] | [quote author=Shout link=topic=13055.msg131418#msg131418 date=1129607454] [quote author=Kp link=topic=13055.msg131393#msg131393 date=1129597186] [/quote] Probably because WPE is eaiser to use. :/ [/quote] Having downloaded ethereal, I agree it is much easier to use, but ill figure out how to use it if this is guaranteed to work. Thanks again guys. | October 19, 2005, 7:21 AM |