Read up, because if this sparked my interest it should spark all you programmers interest.
|October 15, 2005, 02:40 PM|
|Explicit||Based on the comparison chart -- http://www.digitalmars.com/d/comparison.html -- it looks promising.||October 15, 2005, 02:44 PM|
|Talora||Hoorah for x86! What you got on that apple?||October 15, 2005, 02:49 PM|
|Mangix||rofl. i dont agree with some of the chart info|
also Yoni mentioned a few months ago that the D Compiler is still in Alpha
edit:i dont get your last post. are you asking what Apple Computers use? if you are, Macs use PowerPC
|October 15, 2005, 03:16 PM|
Hoorah for x86! What you got on that apple?Well, Apple is switching to x86 boards soon.
|October 15, 2005, 09:05 PM|
|Yegg||https://davnit.net/bnet/vL/phpbbs/index.php?topic=11868.0||October 16, 2005, 04:32 PM|
Yeah, big deal, it comes up every now and then. Would you have rather that he brought up the dead topic?
@Mangix: I don't think anyone really cares whether you agree with some of the chart info. As far as I can tell, it's 100% on. The chart could be updated for C# 2.0, which supports function templating, and I believe his analysis of "is expressions" -- or at least the D implementation of them -- is somewhat on-par with the C# "is" expression (bool objInstance is typeIdentifier).
I'm disappointed it doesn't use RTTI to allow dynamic type instantiation.
|October 17, 2005, 11:23 AM|