Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
rabbit | I've come to the conclusion that the entire purpose of these forums (a facade, and very clever I must say) is to confuse people into believing that some things are not what they seem (*cough*WORD*/cough*). You have poisoned people's minds and soon they will have a mental break down. Your entire plot is to annihilate western culture as we know it. Yes. I've figured you out, BotDev forums. I'm on to you............you should be careful, or I may post something else like this (as I can't actually do anything....BUT I'M WATCHING YOU!) | September 15, 2005, 3:45 AM |
shout | Okay. BYTE = 8-bits WORD = 16-bits on a 16-bit system DWORD = 32-bits on a 16-bit system QWORD = 64-bits on a 16-bit system | September 15, 2005, 3:48 AM |
rabbit | LIES!!! SHOUT IS PART OF "THEY"! A WORD's size is entirely dependant on the machine! THERE IS NO SINGLE DEFINATE SIZE OF A WORD (and hence all multiple are different)! | September 15, 2005, 3:54 AM |
l2k-Shadow | If you are referring to my post, then yes, WORD is a controversial term since it does have different values on different systems and I'm sorry for stating its maximum value is 65535. HOWEVER, considering the fact that a port's maximum value is 65535 and we were talking about visual basic code, which's compiled code will only work on Windows systems, then it is a given that the maximum value of a WORD for that purpose is 65535. | September 15, 2005, 3:54 AM |
Lenny | Many things are still stuck in the 16-bit world, i.e the windows registry. | September 15, 2005, 3:55 AM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Lenny link=topic=12812.msg128201#msg128201 date=1126756515] Many things are still stuck in the 16-bit world, i.e the windows registry. [/quote] Uhhh....? | September 15, 2005, 4:04 AM |
shout | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=12812.msg128203#msg128203 date=1126757043] [quote author=Lenny link=topic=12812.msg128201#msg128201 date=1126756515] Many things are still stuck in the 16-bit world, i.e the windows registry. [/quote] Uhhh....? [/quote] It says DWORD in regedit for integers. | September 15, 2005, 4:06 AM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=rabbit link=topic=12812.msg128196#msg128196 date=1126755949] I've come to the conclusion that the entire purpose of these forums (a facade, and very clever I must say) is to confuse people into believing that some things are not what they seem (*cough*WORD*/cough*). You have poisoned people's minds and soon they will have a mental break down. Your entire plot is to annihilate western culture as we know it. Yes. I've figured you out, BotDev forums. I'm on to you............you should be careful, or I may post something else like this (as I can't actually do anything....BUT I'M WATCHING YOU!) [/quote] Huh? I corrected him and said he should have said 16-bit integer and not WORD because it makes more sense. What's the big problem? And you say you're sorry for being banned? I don't think this topic helps... | September 15, 2005, 4:08 AM |
Kp | [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=12812.msg128203#msg128203 date=1126757043][quote author=Lenny link=topic=12812.msg128201#msg128201 date=1126756515]Many things are still stuck in the 16-bit world, i.e the windows registry.[/quote]Uhhh....?[/quote] Notice that REG_DWORD (a "double word") returns only 4 bytes of data. If the registry were 32bit, returning one word would suffice to give us 4 bytes of data. :) | September 15, 2005, 4:08 AM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Kp link=topic=12812.msg128206#msg128206 date=1126757333] [quote author=MyndFyre link=topic=12812.msg128203#msg128203 date=1126757043][quote author=Lenny link=topic=12812.msg128201#msg128201 date=1126756515]Many things are still stuck in the 16-bit world, i.e the windows registry.[/quote]Uhhh....?[/quote] Notice that REG_DWORD (a "double word") returns only 4 bytes of data. If the registry were 32bit, returning one word would suffice to give us 4 bytes of data. :) [/quote] OMG! The BotDev people have also infected Wikipedia: [quote] The most common microprocessors used in personal computers have the IA-32 architecture (for instance, the Intel Pentiums and AMD Athlons). This architecture is an extension of the original Intel 8086 design which had a word size of 16 bits. The IA-32 processors still support 8086 programs, so the meaning of "word" in the IA-32 context was not changed, and is still said to be 16 bits, despite the fact that they may in actuality operate more like a machine with a 32 bit word size. [/quote] (emphasis added) Source: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_%28computer_science%29[/url] | September 15, 2005, 6:08 AM |
rabbit | September 16, 2005, 1:35 AM |