Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
Forged | This is a realtivlly stupid question, but does bnls still support JSTR? | June 16, 2005, 8:23 AM |
Quarantine | Sure? btw wrong title :p | June 16, 2005, 8:37 AM |
R.a.B.B.i.T | You don't has the CD-Key for JSTR, so if anything, BNLS supports it faster. | June 16, 2005, 2:31 PM |
Forged | I wasn't paying attention when I typed the title. Does it use a diffrent log in style, because the sc style login does not seem to work. | June 16, 2005, 8:08 PM |
Arta | Yes, it uses the old logon. Super-secret uberhint: see my profile text. | June 16, 2005, 8:12 PM |
Yegg | I could of sworn I posted a post before in this topic. Did someone delete it? | June 17, 2005, 10:38 PM |
Quarantine | I bet it was a post linking source code. | June 17, 2005, 10:49 PM |
Yegg | It involved source code. But since Forged needed the JSTR logon sequence, I told him what to use for a good example of it. Don't see why that I had to be deleted. | June 17, 2005, 10:52 PM |
LoRd | [quote author=Yegg link=topic=11849.msg116250#msg116250 date=1119048741] But since Forged needed the JSTR logon sequence, I told him what to use for a good example of it.[/quote] It's set as arta's personal text. | June 17, 2005, 11:09 PM |
Forged | I think he posted it before arta pointed that out to me though. | June 17, 2005, 11:12 PM |
Quarantine | It also involved vL bot which I don't think was released gracefully :P | June 17, 2005, 11:25 PM |
Yegg | oh, sorry about that. I thought its source was released to the public by its owner. | June 18, 2005, 2:31 AM |
Kp | What is this "vL bot" of which you speak? To my knowledge, never has any [vL] released such a creation. | June 18, 2005, 4:04 AM |
laurion | [quote author=Kp link=topic=11849.msg116304#msg116304 date=1119067468] What is this "vL bot" of which you speak? To my knowledge, never has any [vL] released such a creation. [/quote] Exactly, it wasn't supposed to be released :P | June 18, 2005, 4:08 AM |
Topaz | Released due to DM. | June 18, 2005, 4:27 AM |
Forged | It was not on that site I don't believe. I guess they took it down, because I looked and did not see it. | June 18, 2005, 4:52 AM |
dRAgoN | [quote author=Kp link=topic=11849.msg116304#msg116304 date=1119067468] What is this "vL bot" of which you speak? To my knowledge, never has any [vL] released such a creation. [/quote] Think its real name was vLBBot. | June 18, 2005, 7:01 AM |
Kp | [quote author=l)ragon link=topic=11849.msg116340#msg116340 date=1119078118][quote author=Kp link=topic=11849.msg116304#msg116304 date=1119067468]What is this "vL bot" of which you speak? To my knowledge, never has any [vL] released such a creation.[/quote]Think its real name was vLBBot.[/quote] I wondered how long it'd take someone to point out Warrior's mistake. :) | June 18, 2005, 3:34 PM |
Yegg | Well in about 2001 or 2000, I first connected through vLBot. It was one of the first bots I'd ever used at the time, and there wern't very many bots out at the time. I couldn't even name 4 bots. But it was "publicly" released on a few sites and I decided to use it (I don't think the source was out at all). I recently found the source on zeroforce.net. It looks to me like it was in fact created by vL too. | June 18, 2005, 4:43 PM |
Kp | So if someone stuck a "made by [vL]" image on a program, you'll trust it's from us, despite public commentary from [vL] members that it isn't from us? ;) | June 18, 2005, 5:08 PM |
Yegg | Umm, I dunno, it looks like vL work. And since it was made so long ago, there weren't many other people who could have created it. Would you like an executable of it? Also, why would any waste so much time and effort to create a vLBot if they wern't in vL? At this point in time there wern't very many bot developers. Note: A long time ago refers to year 2001. That's the creation date. | June 18, 2005, 5:53 PM |