[img]http://blazenet.servebeer.com/thumb?image=megawtf.jpg&height=600&width=600[/img]

[img]http://blazenet.servebeer.com/thumb?image=megawtf.jpg&height=666&width=666[/img]

[img]http://blazenet.servebeer.com/thumb?image=megawtf.jpg&height=80&width=80[/img]

It works.

...I don't get it

I was testing my thumbnail script for sizing..

[quote]
[img]http://blazenet.servebeer.com/thumb?image=megawtf.jpg&height=80&width=555[/img]
[/quote]

Hehe it does! :P

What the fuck is that image supposed to be?

That's an interesting script. It would be nice if you used a better resizing algorithm though.
http://blazenet.servebeer.com/thumb?image=megawtf.jpg

It really wasn't made for making images bigger really. I made it for this http://blazenet.servebeer.com/site.php?page=gallery

Not responding now, but anyway, what kind of CPU use does that script produce?

14% for running the script and using ff to do it.

[quote author=Blaze link=topic=11346.msg109924#msg109924 date=1114476240]
14% for running the script and using ff to do it.
[/quote]

I meant more on the lines of how many milliseconds of cpu time does it take to display your thumbnail gallery.. Just 14% without saying how long doesn't give much information. Would it work for a more visited site?

Also, I see something you may want to fix. The thumbnails don't get cached here. Every time I click a picture and then go back to the gallery, all the thumbnails are reloaded. That must cause a lot of extra server load.

I noticed that too, I'll see if I can fix it.