Author | Message | Time |
---|---|---|
JoeTheOdd | I think we should install Karma on these forums. What about you guys? | April 11, 2005, 1:19 AM |
Archonist | [quote author=Joe[x86] link=topic=11237.msg108105#msg108105 date=1113182365] I think we should install Karma on these forums. What about you guys? [/quote] Been there, done that... | April 11, 2005, 1:21 AM |
Invert | *Places his finger in the middle of his lips* shhhhhhhhhh! | April 11, 2005, 1:22 AM |
peofeoknight | why was karma removed anyway? | April 11, 2005, 1:22 AM |
Lenny | https://davnit.net/bnet/vL/phpbbs/index.php?action=search | April 11, 2005, 1:26 AM |
UserLoser. | [me=UserLoser]whistles and looks around wondering what karma is[/me] | April 11, 2005, 3:04 AM |
JoeTheOdd | Latest item on search for "karma": UL's post above me. Hmm. | April 11, 2005, 3:17 AM |
Archonist | [quote author=UserLoser link=topic=11237.msg108115#msg108115 date=1113188649] [me=UserLoser]whistles and looks around wondering what karma is[/me] [/quote] I was gonna comment on you and karma in my original post... :P Joe, it's there.. | April 11, 2005, 3:19 AM |
UserLoser. | [quote author=Joe[x86] link=topic=11237.msg108121#msg108121 date=1113189455] Latest item on search for "karma": UL's post above me. Hmm. [/quote] I know what karma is, I don't need to search for it. I do believe I had a great effect on why it's not here anymore :o | April 11, 2005, 3:22 AM |
Myndfyr | As I recall, the karma feature was enabled until someone somehow figured out how to abuse it. I believe UL might have been that someone. :P Anyway, it has had something of a positive effect, as people don't make the single post of "+1" or "-1" with absolutely no content. | April 11, 2005, 7:52 AM |
Spht | Don't worry. A new method of ranking is coming to a forum near you! | April 11, 2005, 10:11 AM |
iago | MyndFyre is correct -- far too many threads would degrade to "+1 to xxx" or "-1 to xxx" that it just got irritating. UL's scheme had very little to do with the decision :P | April 11, 2005, 1:47 PM |
Adron | [quote author=iago link=topic=11237.msg108161#msg108161 date=1113227262] MyndFyre is correct -- far too many threads would degrade to "+1 to xxx" or "-1 to xxx" that it just got irritating. UL's scheme had very little to do with the decision :P [/quote] And besides, UL's scheme was a good thing, us admins are always on the lookout for new reasons to ban people! | April 11, 2005, 2:34 PM |
Arta | Karma was diabled, because karma is: - annoying - judgemental - flamebait - spammy - meaningless In other words, a distractful waste of time and space. Ugh. | April 11, 2005, 3:07 PM |
KoRRuPT | [quote author=Arta[vL] link=topic=11237.msg108175#msg108175 date=1113232075] Karma was diabled, because karma is: - annoying - judgemental - flamebait - spammy - meaningless In other words, a distractful waste of time and space. Ugh. [/quote] I agree. I used to belong to a forum with karma, I found it to be annoying and pointless. | April 11, 2005, 4:17 PM |
CrAz3D | [quote author=Spht link=topic=11237.msg108149#msg108149 date=1113214286] Don't worry. A new method of ranking is coming to a forum near you! [/quote]+1! Any idea when this ranking system might be in place? ;) | April 11, 2005, 5:10 PM |
hismajesty | [quote author=CrAz3D link=topic=11237.msg108181#msg108181 date=1113239415] [quote author=Spht link=topic=11237.msg108149#msg108149 date=1113214286] Don't worry. A new method of ranking is coming to a forum near you! [/quote]+1! Any idea when this ranking system might be in place? ;) [/quote] and at which forum? | April 11, 2005, 6:55 PM |
iago | It'll probably be completed whenever World of Warcraft becomes boring for those currently playing it. | April 11, 2005, 7:28 PM |
Grok | Karma distracted from content. | April 11, 2005, 7:43 PM |
The-Rabid-Lord | I think Karma gave a good point at to how you were on the forums. Low karma then obviousley you need to pick yourself up. | April 11, 2005, 7:59 PM |
peofeoknight | Wouldn't karma cut down on lame posts too? For example people just posting ramdom stupid stuff or random outragious stuff just for attention. | April 11, 2005, 8:57 PM |
Mitosis | Yes we could just give them bad Karma so the admins know who to deal with. | April 11, 2005, 10:05 PM |
Adron | Actually, there are more misbehaving people on the forums than behaving people a lot of the time. At least, if you add karma, the amount of karma changes made by misbehaving people will drown out the appropriate karma given. Karma will have no useful meaning. | April 11, 2005, 10:29 PM |
hismajesty | Unless only a certain few (vL members/YaBB Gods (;)), perhaps) had access to altering karma. | April 11, 2005, 10:31 PM |
Zakath | That actually would be an interesting way to do it. If only those recognized in some way as being respectable could manipulate Karma, it could actually work. However, as mentioned, an alternate system is already in the works. | April 11, 2005, 10:46 PM |
Adron | Well, one way of solving that would be that only those with a high enough karma can modify karma. That way we'll get a ruling upper class, which can keep the others suppressed as needed. | April 11, 2005, 11:05 PM |
Mitosis | All the ideas you guys have said sound great, really. Maybe you guys could make a list of them, and get the members of the forum to vote for like the top 5. Then once that is istablished the members of vL could chose which you guys think best? </suggestion> | April 11, 2005, 11:08 PM |
KkBlazekK | I think it would be a good idea to implement it again as long as one of these rules was used... | April 11, 2005, 11:08 PM |
UserLoser. | The last three posts before the two before this sound good. UserLoser is trying to straighten his act up here, and we all know I hate negative karma so acting bad won't do me any good :P | April 11, 2005, 11:10 PM |
Myndfyr | [quote author=Mitosis link=topic=11237.msg108246#msg108246 date=1113260894] All the ideas you guys have said sound great, really. Maybe you guys could make a list of them, and get the members of the forum to vote for like the top 5. Then once that is istablished the members of vL could chose which you guys think best? </suggestion> [/quote] Silly Mitosis... [quote author=Adron link=topic=11185.msg107426#msg107426 date=1112700306] The public never gets to vote on such issues.[/quote] Of course, that use of that quote might more readily belong in this thread ;) | April 11, 2005, 11:50 PM |